Web platforms facing liability for damaging user statements

The following excerpt is from an article that originally appeared on WND Econony

A bill in Congress to combat sex-trafficking on the Internet is drawing considerable opposition from a coalition of privacy experts and activists for its apparent threat to free speech, according to a report in Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin.

Aaron Mackey wrote in a legislative analysis for the Electronic Frontier Foundation of his opposition to the Senate’s proposed Stop Enabling Sex Trafficking Act and a House counterpart, which would roll back Section 230 of federal law, which is described as “one of the most important laws protecting online free speech.”

Section 230, he explained, generally immunizes Internet intermediaries from legal liability for hosting user-generated content.

“Many websites or services that we rely on host third-party content in some way – social media sites, phot and video-sharing apps, newspaper comment sections, and even community mailing lists,” Mackey pointed out.

“This content is often offensive when, for example, users make defamatory statements about

Click here to Read this Entire Story on WND Econony

This post was originally published on this site
Comments are closed.